Christopher C Chimelis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 09:46:42 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Loic Prylli wrote:
> I thought glibc 2.1 was upward compatible with 2.0, so will it really be
> necessary to recompile all the stuff? Or maybe only the libraries?
Just the libs, really. Bash has libreadline and a new egcs needs to be
compiled (1.1.2), which is why I posted. I just didn't see the need to
recompile alot of the current x86 packages for potato until I get the new
compiler and glibc uploaded (save us all some trouble and give everyone a
few days' rest...except me, of course ;-).
Also, obviously, anything that depends on alot of these libs probably
should be recompiled (if they don't outright need recompiling).
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue Mar 09 1999 - 07:00:24 PST